A Shifting Landscape in Canadian Immigration Policy

Canada, long lauded for its welcoming stance towards immigrants and refugees, appears to be at a critical juncture, according to numerous experts, lawyers, and human rights advocates. A growing sentiment of concern surrounds the nation's evolving immigration policies, which some describe as a departure from its historical commitment to migrant and refugee rights. This transformation is unfolding amidst increasing domestic socioeconomic challenges, including housing shortages and inflation, which have contributed to a public discourse that increasingly questions the benefits of high immigration levels.

Diana Gallego, co-executive director of the FCJ Refugee Centre in Toronto, articulates a sense of disillusionment, noting a stark contrast between Prime Minister Mark Carney’s international rhetoric and his government’s internal policies. While Carney has advocated for a more independent global order, Gallego observes that Canada's actions at home suggest a tightening of borders. "Canada is closing the doors now," she asserts, reflecting a widespread apprehension among those working with newcomers.

Economic Pressures and Public Opinion

For many decades, Canada's immigration strategy was widely seen as a cornerstone of its economic growth, addressing labor market gaps and counteracting an aging population. However, recent years have witnessed a significant change in public perception. The rapid increase in temporary residents, particularly under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s administration to fill pandemic-era labor shortages, coincided with escalating costs of living and strain on public services. By October 2024, nearly 3.15 million non-permanent residents resided in Canada, representing approximately 8 percent of the population.

This period of high temporary immigration coincided with mounting domestic challenges, such as a lack of affordable housing, rising grocery prices, and extended healthcare wait times. Consequently, public attitudes began to harden, with a 2024 poll indicating, for the first time in decades, that a majority of Canadians felt there was "too much immigration." This shift in public sentiment has been accompanied by a rise in xenophobic incidents in some of Canada’s major cities.

In response to public pressure, the Trudeau government initiated measures to reduce immigration to more "sustainable" levels, including cuts to international student visas. Allan Rock, a former Canadian justice minister, suggests that the government has been "reading the room" and perceiving a public link between local economic difficulties and migration. However, he also cautions against leadership succumbing to "erroneous beliefs" rather than challenging them.

Policy Shifts Under the Carney Government

Since assuming office in April 2025, Prime Minister Mark Carney has continued the trajectory set by his predecessor, further implementing restrictive immigration policies. A notable development is the passage of Bill C-12 in late March, a comprehensive law that empowers the government to revoke visas, including those of permanent residents, if deemed in the "public interest." This legislation also introduces restrictions to Canada's refugee status determination system, which legal experts argue could be "arbitrary" and potentially unconstitutional.

The government justifies Bill C-12 as an effort to streamline a backlogged asylum system and prevent "fraud." The Immigration, Refugees and Citizenship Canada (IRCC) spokesperson stated that the law addresses "global migration pressures" and aims to provide "faster protection for those in need" while upholding Canada's international obligations and charter rights. However, critics, including Julia Sande of Amnesty International Canada, contend that the law is unlikely to resolve the existing backlog of nearly 300,000 cases at the Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada (IRB).

Instead, Sande argues that such policies may inadvertently fuel public misconceptions, suggesting that individuals are exploiting the system. She highlights that while Canadians face genuine struggles like housing crises and inflation, governments may be redirecting blame towards vulnerable groups rather than addressing systemic issues. "Governments look for a group to blame – and who’s better to blame than people who don’t have the right to vote and can’t vote you out?" she remarked.

Concerns Over Reduced Support and Weakened Oversight

Beyond Bill C-12, the Carney government has also implemented other measures that raise concerns among advocates. These include rolling back a healthcare program for refugees, extending a freeze on refugee resettlement applications, and announcing significant funding cuts to various ministries, including the immigration department. Reports of planned cuts at the IRB further exacerbate fears that delays in processing refugee claims could worsen.

Maureen Silcoff, a refugee lawyer and former IRB member, emphasizes the government's responsibility to proactively dispel myths surrounding refugees, particularly given the global surge in anti-immigrant rhetoric. She notes that a lack of a clear plan to address the IRB backlog contributes to negative public perception.

Despite these concerns, Prime Minister Carney has maintained high approval ratings, often framing his government’s actions as a necessary response to external pressures, such as those from the Trump administration. John Carlaw, an assistant professor specializing in Canadian politics and immigration at Toronto Metropolitan University, describes this period as "troubling," observing a "major withdrawal of social spending and then an investment in militarism and border enforcement." He suggests that the government appears disinclined to incorporate feedback from communities working with migrants and immigrants, particularly when it challenges their current policy direction.

Source: Original Article