The Call for Tangible Reparations Over Symbolic Apologies
For numerous descendants of enslaved Africans, a formal apology for the transatlantic slave trade falls short of true justice. As the movement for reparations gains momentum, there is a growing consensus that acknowledgement without substantial action cannot adequately address the profound and lasting consequences of generations of loss, displacement, and exploitation. This discussion has been reinvigorated following a recent conference on slavery and reparatory justice held in Accra, Ghana.
The three-day “Next Steps” conference, which took place from June 17 to 19, convened heads of state, policymakers, legal experts, civil society organizations, and members of the African diaspora. This gathering occurred months after the United Nations General Assembly adopted a significant resolution, supported by 123 nations, recognizing the transatlantic slave trade as one of history's most egregious crimes against humanity. Participants at the Accra conference endorsed a 19-point framework, advocating for formal apologies from nations and institutions that profited from slavery. Crucially, this framework also called for the establishment of reparations mechanisms, debt relief, the repatriation of cultural artifacts and human remains, educational initiatives, and enhanced international cooperation.
Despite these developments, many descendants of enslaved Africans maintain that an apology, regardless of its formality, is far from adequate. Yaw Owusu Akyeaw of African Diaspora 126+, an organization dedicated to facilitating Ghanaian residency and citizenship for diaspora members, expressed reservations. “I am not too eager to accept apology for egregious crimes committed against humanity,” Akyeaw stated, emphasizing that a verbal apology is often perceived as a symbolic gesture that acknowledges wrongdoing without providing tangible redress or compensation for the affected.
Akyeaw likened such apologies to a tactic employed by offenders to evade responsibility. “A serial killer will gladly offer an apology, if by doing so, he will spend less time or no time in prison. This type of apology is considered by some people as a public relations ploy to avoid penance, negotiate compensation or exculpate punishment for the wrong done,” he elaborated. Marvin Walker, a Guyanese entrepreneur who has relocated to Ghana to reconnect with his ancestral heritage, echoed this sentiment, describing apologies as potentially superficial gestures that lack genuine remorse or a commitment to change.
Beyond the Enslaved: Intergenerational Trauma and Lost Development
The transatlantic slave trade’s impact extended far beyond those forcibly removed from the African continent. It inflicted widespread devastation, tearing apart families, destabilizing communities, and depriving Africa of countless individuals, labor, and knowledge. David Adofo of the African Chamber of Content Producers (ACCP), a pan-African organization with observer status at the African Union’s Economic, Social and Cultural Council (ECOSOCC), highlighted the enduring trauma passed down through generations to those who remained.
“Slavery did not only affect those who were taken away, but those who were left behind, as they lost loved ones, they lost trust in humanity, passing that sentiment to generations. It also interrupted Africa’s growing civilisation at the time,” Adofo explained. He further asserted that “The best of Africa was taken out of the continent to help grow the civilisation of the new world.”
Adofo also drew attention to the lasting legacy of colonial-era initiatives, such as the Bantu Educational Kinema Experiment (BEKE). This British colonial film project, active in East and Central Africa between 1935 and 1937, produced instructional films designed to promote the “educational and cultural adjustment of Africans to Western society.” These films, characterized by paternalistic portrayals of African life, served to reinforce colonial values and imperial economic interests. Adofo argued that the damage from such colonial indoctrination persists, advocating for significant investment from Western nations to fund educational content production developed by Africans. This, he believes, would help reshape mindsets and address the historical injustices.
The Deep Scars of a Lingering Past
For some descendants of enslaved Africans, the historical wounds are so profound that no apology, however sincere, can provide closure. One individual, a descendant of laborers left behind after the abolition of slavery who could not return due to severed ancestral ties, spoke anonymously about the sensitivity surrounding servile ancestry in his community. “I have no clue where I am originally from,” he shared, adding that “No amount of apology will give me any closure.”
Historical records document the brutal journeys of captives from present-day Ghana and other parts of West Africa, forced through inland trading routes to coastal forts like Cape Coast Castle and Elmina Castle. At sites such as Assin Manso, many took what became known as their “last bath” before the final harrowing journey across the Atlantic. Today, in communities across Ghana’s Central Region, including Assin Manso, Cape Coast, and Elmina, a pervasive silence often surrounds families descended from those who remained after slavery. Younger generations frequently avoid discussing their family histories due to long-standing taboos associated with servile ancestry.
Moving Beyond Symbolism Towards Concrete Action
The debate over the sufficiency of apologies reflects a broader division within the global reparations movement. While some view formal acknowledgement as a crucial initial step, others contend that it holds little meaning without tangible measures to address the enduring repercussions of slavery. Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama, a key proponent of the UN resolution, indicated that the recent conference aimed to shift the conversation beyond mere symbolism toward actionable solutions. He announced the establishment of three international bodies focused on reparatory justice, cultural restitution, and legal affairs.
However, for many descendants, justice will not be determined by official pronouncements alone. As one descendant articulated, “We’ve suffered loss of identity. We were separated from our ancestral land, our spirituality replaced with their religion. They can keep their apology and give us what is morally owed with a side of compensation.” This perspective underscores the deep-seated desire for substantive redress that goes beyond words to address the multifaceted impacts of historical injustices.
Source: Original Article
